>ect 6 WHY is Speculative Realism?

WHERE do the words “Speculative” and “Realism” come from? WHY is “Correlationism” a problem for philosophy? //and// HOW might we overcome  philosophy’s non-relation to the non-philosophical?

A decade since the publication of Quentin Meillassoux’s After Finitude, discussions surrounding the so-called “speculative realist” movement have become myopic. Obsessed with idiosyncratic divisions and disputes, these discussions overwhelmingly represent misguided attempts to dictate WHAT speculative realism is.

In this episode, >ect attempts to approach things differently. Taking a cue from Deleuze and Guattari, we ask: To what problems do these philosophies respond? Instead of asking WHAT, we ask, WHY is Speculative Realism?

Music:

‘Concret PH’ by Iannis Xenakis, Electronic Music (2000)
‘Biogenesis’ by Eliane Radigue (1996)

Artwork:

Field 8 Detail 6  © Emma McNally

Readings:

Quentin Meillassoux “Metaphysics, Fideism, Speculation” (Chapter 2 of After Finitude)

Ray Brassier “Materialism, Science, and Phenomenology” (Introduction to Alien Theory)

Armen Avanessian and Suhail Malik “Genealogies of Speculation (Introduction)”

 

 

 

Advertisements

7 thoughts on “>ect 6 WHY is Speculative Realism?”

  1. be interested if after this you folks think there is more to “speculative” than going beyond the established (by science?) while still trying to be somewhat concrete, or perhaps if this is just really a rehash of critical/theory talk, by and large I’ve found it all to be going nowhere and not intentionally

    Like

  2. Thanks for this, I thoroughly enjoyed it.
    It serves as an excellent primer for this kind of thing. Very coherent and well articulated without the gratuitous jargonism that has become so common.

    Like

  3. Your listeners may enjoy this book featuring an interviews with Ray Brassier, Iain Hamilton Grant, and Quentin Meillassaoux. I read the first chapter (it was posted at one point) and seems to cover alot of ideas and people left out of the few commentaries on SR which do exist mainly because of personal politics and agendas. There is good coverage in particular of the Brassier/Blake/Wolfendale/Niemoczynski “axis.” Check it out! https://www.academia.edu/25061652/Speculative_Realism_An_Epitome_forthcoming_through_Kismet_Press_2016_

    Like

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s